Floodwaters destroy homes.
Illness takes a loved one.
Violence changes a family forever.
In moments like these, the question is not just academic: If God is good and powerful, why does He allow evil and suffering?
The Question Behind the Pain
The presence of suffering is one of the most serious challenges raised against Christianity. Pain can make God seem distant, indifferent, or even powerless. Christianity does not ask people to pretend that suffering is small or easy to explain. Instead, it offers a response that takes both human freedom and human pain seriously.
God created human beings with genuine freedom. Love and moral goodness have meaning only when they are chosen, yet that same freedom makes the choice of evil possible. For that reason, the presence of evil does not logically rule out a good and powerful God.
Freedom Makes Love Meaningful
Alvin Plantinga’s free-will defense does not claim that God causes evil or that every evil act is necessary. It argues that God’s goodness and power can remain consistent with the existence of evil if meaningful freedom is itself a genuine good. Creating free persons while determining every choice they make would be logically inconsistent.
Genesis 2 presents Adam and Eve with a real command and a real alternative. Their obedience mattered because they could have chosen otherwise. This does not mean that virtue requires the actual occurrence of extreme evil. It means that moral freedom includes the possibility of rejecting what is good. Freedom itself does not require great evil, but when people repeatedly misuse their freedom, the damage can deepen and spread through families, communities, and generations.
J. P. Moreland and Tim Muehlhoff illustrate this difference by comparing genuine human love with the response of a programmed doll. A toy can be made to say loving words, but it cannot choose to love. In the same way, human beings who were programmed to do only good might behave correctly, but their obedience would not be a freely offered relationship.
A fair objection remains: If God knew that humanity would misuse freedom, why create us at all? God’s foreknowledge did not cause human choices. Romans 5:12 places responsibility for sin on human disobedience rather than on God. Christianity teaches that God permitted meaningful freedom and, knowing its cost, prepared redemption rather than abandoning His creation.
What About Natural Suffering
Human choices explain much suffering, but they do not immediately explain earthquakes, disease, or other natural disasters. Genesis 3:17–19 and Romans 8:20–22 portray creation itself as affected by the fall. The world now experiences pain, death, and decay that were not part of God’s original design. This does not mean that every disaster is a punishment for a particular person’s sin. It means that humanity lives within a creation that is damaged and awaiting restoration.
That explanation does not remove grief, and Scripture does not treat grief as a failure of faith. Psalm 23:4 and Psalm 34:18 describe God as near to those who suffer. Jesus also wept at the death of Lazarus in John 11:35. The existence of suffering is not proof that God is absent from those who endure it.
God Entered Human Suffering
Christianity’s most important answer to suffering is not a detached theory. It is Jesus Christ. Timothy Keller emphasizes that the Christian God entered the suffering of the world rather than remaining outside it. Jesus experienced rejection, injustice, physical agony, and death. At the right time, when humanity was powerless and separated from God, Christ willingly died for sinners (Rom. 5:6–8).
The crucifixion shows that God can bring a saving purpose from an act intended for evil. Sinful people unjustly condemned and killed Jesus, yet God used that act to accomplish salvation through Christ’s death and resurrection (Acts 2:23). This does not make evil good. Rather, it shows that what the enemy intended for harm, God can redeem and ultimately overcome.
Suffering Does Not Have the Final Word
The gospel does not promise believers a life without pain. What it promises is that suffering and death will not have the final word. Because Jesus died for our sins and rose from the dead, forgiveness and eternal life are available to everyone who trusts in Him. Scripture invites each person to repent, confess Jesus as Lord, believe that God raised Him from the dead, and place faith in Him as Savior (Acts 3:19; Rom. 10:9–10). Salvation is not earned through human effort. It is God’s gift of grace received through faith in Jesus Christ (Eph. 2:8–9).
Christianity may not provide complete explanations for every tragedy. What it does offer is something that is more personal: a God who is present in our suffering, a Savior who entered it, and a promise that God will finally overcome it. Revelation 21:4 describes the day when death, mourning, crying, and pain will be gone. Christian hope is not that our present suffering is imaginary, but that God will redeem His people and make all things new.
___________________________________________________
Intended Audience and Purpose
This blog is intended for believers and nonbelievers who struggle with the question of why a good God allows evil and suffering. I chose this topic because pain touches every person, and questions about God often arise in recovery ministry, pastoral care, and ordinary conversations. My purpose is to show that Christianity does not ignore suffering but offers both a reasonable defense of God’s goodness and hope through Jesus Christ. I want a hurting reader to understand that suffering does not have to separate a person from God and that the gospel offers forgiveness, restoration, and eternal life.
Sources Consulted
Keller, Timothy. Walking with God through Pain and Suffering. New York: Dutton, 2013.
Moreland, J. P., and Tim Muehlhoff. The God Conversation: Using Stories and Illustrations to Explain Your Faith. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Books, 2017.
Plantinga, Alvin. God, Freedom, and Evil. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1974.
The Holy Bible, New International Version.
Leave a Reply